Weak vs. Feeble: What's the Difference?

While both "weak" and "feeble" describe a lack of strength, there's a subtle difference in how we use them. "Weak" is a more general term referring to a lack of physical or mental strength. It can also describe things that are easily broken or ineffective. "Feeble," on the other hand, suggests a more extreme lack of strength, often implying frailty or weakness that is pathetic or pathetically weak. Think of it as a more intense and emotionally charged way to describe something lacking power.

Here are some example sentences to illustrate the difference:

  • Weak:

    • "He felt weak after his illness." (He lacked physical strength after being sick.)
    • "The evidence against her was weak." (The evidence was not strong enough to convict her.)
  • Feeble:

    • "His feeble attempts to stand up were pitiful." (His attempts to stand were weak and pathetic.)
    • "A feeble cry came from the injured child." (The child's cry was very weak and showed how much they were suffering.)

Notice how "feeble" emphasizes the pathetic nature of the weakness, whereas "weak" simply states the fact of the weakness. In the first example of feeble, his attempts were not simply weak, but his weakness was pitiable. In the second example, it was not simply a weak cry, but one that spoke of an extremely weakened state. You would rarely use "feeble" when "weak" would be perfectly sufficient.

Happy learning!

Learn English with Images

With over 120,000 photos and illustrations